<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Daily Dopeness - Latest Comments in Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.disqus.com/</link><description>The ramblings of a currency speculator</description><atom:link href="https://dopeness.disqus.com/daily_dopeness_stocktweets_user_opinion_poll/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:50:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-613643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thakn you&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andhra</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 09:50:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-559424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://stocktweets.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://stocktweets.tumblr.com/"&gt;http://stocktweets.tumblr.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soren Macbeth</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:37:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-558875</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We need it to have it re-tweet the stock picks. That's the whole key to this here thing!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A second twitter bot for replies may be a good way to do this, that's a good idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Or if it gets too much, make different segments like @stocktweetstech or something.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RacerRick</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-554676</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would like th see #3, but #2 is a good option for the interim basis and some might prefer it, overall. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Milner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:17:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-553510</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#3 would be the best&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ManyPeaks</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:34:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-551803</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#3 is a definite and #2 is a most likely. Thanks for the input. More features to come sooooooooooon. Keep tweeting those $ tickers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Soren Macbeth</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:29:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-551284</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree... No. 2 and No. 3 options are the best for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Heckler511</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:22:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-551106</link><description>&lt;p&gt;#2 and an additional web interface to view the data.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 14:00:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-551072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I vote #3, #2 is a good compromise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would likely unfollow @StockTweets if #1 won the vote...and just check the feed when I'm bored.  Of course, depending on the usefulness it ended up generating.  I guess #2 is a good compromise.  But I mean, I follow who I follow, because I think they are smart people.  Somebody somewhere on twitter bought and sold AAPL at least every other day...I don't care about that data.  I know somebody somewhere IS buying AND selling AAPL...I have data feeds for that.  Just my $0.02.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">McLarty</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:57:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-551002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;3) I vote for no bot and wait for website with ideally an RSS feed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:50:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Daily Dopeness - StockTweets User Opinion Poll</title><link>http://dopeness.org/post/36477080#comment-550949</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i'd vote for an additional bot that we can choose to follow.  because, after all, a lot of people are already following those who post $ tweets.  so you'd be getting the message twice and it would clog things up.  just my opinion, but i'm sure there's people out there who want the info.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;so i'd say adding a different bot would allow people to choose whether or not they want an aggregation of all the $ tweets.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">madhatter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 13:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>